- Symantec endpoint protection 14.2.760.0 software#
- Symantec endpoint protection 14.2.760.0 plus#
- Symantec endpoint protection 14.2.760.0 free#
Symantec endpoint protection 14.2.760.0 free#
We also went with Trend Micro, specifically the Worry Free Business Security Services, included Phish Insight as well for end user training (BONUS!!) on top of it all being cloud managed etc.
Symantec endpoint protection 14.2.760.0 software#
There was a learning curve for the new software for rather pleased with Trend.
Symantec endpoint protection 14.2.760.0 plus#
It was rather shocking that we used Symantec for 10 plus years, and suddenly decided they no longer wanted our money, it was a rather easy move for us, 2000 plus end points. YEs we had this issue, we tried shortly before the acquisition to get more licenses, and never got them, then were told that we "weren't large enough" to renew our current licenses, so we ended up dropping Symantec, and went with Trend Micro. I hope you have the same window to do some serious POC's and get the right tool for the job going forward, Deanna4500. We are a month out from our Cylance subscription expiring, and we started our selection process in November, bought our licensing at the end of December, so we're feeling good about getting all the endpoints migrated in plenty of time. The multi-tenancy features are actually a little irritating, and the lack of role customization/ACL modify is a little frustrating, but that's seriously nit-picking. No need to import IOC's to the EDR (looking at you CylanceOPTICS!) or save hashfiles for malware to create a static hit list (looking at you CS:Falcon). Turns out a significant number of Cylance alums have gone to S1 in the last year! The pre-loaded application profile exclusions made it easy to setup groups appropriate to AutoDesk workstations, SQL Servers, Domain Controllers, etc. It reminds me of the good things about Cylance that we got accustomed to. Group memberships are easily changed, quickly - made Falcon look broken. The client installer is easily deployed with group identity, something Sophos falls flat on. The console is discoverable and sensible, the inputs have responsive outputs (CS:Falcon lags like Hell, reboot several times to get a policy to stick). I included them for completeness of the evaluation, not because I expected anything to come of it. Lots and lots of different moving parts that have been bolted together to create an effective solution - but a heavy one. Sophos is a very solid offering, good console, good control over the endpoints, really heavy footprint. I expected to select CrowdStrike as they have the rep and the features that pretty well define the NGAV market. We did a POC for three different replacements, CrowdStrike Falcon, Sophos Intercept-X, and SentinelOne. Unfortunately the BlackBerry acquisition has turned out as badly as we expected. We've been a VERY satisfied user of CylancePROTECT and more recently CylanceOPTICS and have had five years of outstanding protection. SEP has been behind the curve for a long time now, all the breaches of Federal agencies have been with SEP on the GSA schedule. The only company I've seen re-form themselves to a modern take on AV has been Sophos with their Intercept-X and EDR. I don't have any use for the legacy AV systems that claim to have bolted on ML and EDR. We settled on Sophos as the replacement, both internally and to resell, but there are many vendors in this space, so you really need to look at your own requirements, try a few, and decide what the best fit for your org is. Panda is pretty light on resources, but I don't have any knowledge of the management tools. Webroot has been popular, but I don't have any direct experience or knowledge of the product.īitdefender was a little too heavy for our customers when we last tested (almost 2 years ago, may be different now). Kaspersky has a decent product, but I've had issues with their support in the past. There was no way the product and support was worth that money any more.ĮSET has a good product, but a 500-seat company we talk to often has it, and for them has been support has been an issue. You have to purchase the new versions outright, which vastly increases costs. Better or worse? Time will tell.īasically, it is true you cannot renew the original product (SEP was a big seller for us). Broadcom has different company vision and culture, different business processes, so Symantec had to come in line with that. And yes, it is because of the Broadcom acquisition. But the renewals issue threw it over the top. But their support had been going downhill, other Symantec departments were shown to be less security conscious (such as losing control of Intermediate signing certificates, and problematic SSL certificate issuance practices, which led in part to the cert signing business being sold off), and other issues. As a VAR, we were a Symantec partner for many years. Basically, this is why we dumped Symantec about 2 years ago.
0 kommentar(er)
